So the question asked is this “Do round rotis taste better than non-round ones?”.
And that is an interesting, very interesting, question. It brings to the fore many concepts that we possibly take for granted, but perhaps should review more often. So let’s take a look at the question and break it down.
First, we consider the definition of “roti”. Does this include chapatis, parathas ( including paranthas and paronthis ), naans and kulchas? What about puris and luchis? ( Bongs don’t differentiate between the two, but there is a difference. Trust me, I’m a Punjabi … ) What about double-roti (pau-roti, if Bong)? Double roti aka bread has many sub-varieties, which for your sake I shall not get into. You’re welcome.
Second, why are rotis round? Is a round shape mandated by some decree or law? I don’t think so. Or is it merely a physical limitation imposed on the roti by the act of rolling it out? Possibly, this is true, if you are an experienced roti roller-outer. However, if you’ve never rolled out a roti before, chances are you’re more likely to end with a non-round roti. If you do get the mix of dusted flour, kneaded atta and the right aerobic method going in your arms, you are more likely than not going to produce a round roti. In other words, expert roti rollers almost always end up with round rotis.
Next, we consider the possible shape varieties. These fall into 3 main varieties, as follows:
- Map of India or polygonal
- Square ( 4 sided )
- Triangle( 3-sided )
For simplicity’s sake we shall ignore rectangles ( which we club into “square” ) and sub-varieties of triangles, such right-angled triangles, isosceles, equilateral, scalene, oblique or obtuse. No, I’m not calling you names, there is such a thing as an obtuse triangle, trust me, I’m a Punjabi….
It is very likely that the square and the triangle are deliberate and consciously produced shapes. Paronthis are usually triangular as opposed to paronthas which are more likely to be round or square. If we discount, then, the square and triangles forms, we’re left with the shapeless roti. Or rather the polygonal roti aka map-of-India roti.
Now consider the emotional and psychological impact of a deliberate shape versus an indeterminate shape. Since the human brain likes order and brings what it thinks is order to everything, it is more likely to trigger a positive response when it sees a strongly determined shape and rejects the shapeless roti.
Chefs have told us for years that the look and feel of the food is as important, if not more important, than the taste of the food. I can vouch for that. You won’t be getting me to eat an oyster any time soon. Or octopus, which reminds me of 8 varieties of pus.
This is more than likely to bring us to the conclusion that the positive impact of the strongly defined shape will make us believe that the round roti tastes better. In reality, though, it is more than likely a question of trust. We trust the cook who can produce a deliberate shape and we mistrust the one who can’t. We believe the good cook’s food will taste better and the rotten cook’s will not. The human brain is a crazy place and we don’t fully understand it. Hell, I do have a brain, at least that’s what I’m told I’m supposed to have in the cranial cavity encapsulated between my ears on the East/West axis and eyes / occiput on a North/South axis, and I don’t even understand that. ( Yes, that’s how the spell “back of the head”, it is pronounced “oxyput”, trust me, I’m a Punjabi… )
Having said all that, what have we proved? Let us recap:
Q: Do round rotis taste better than non-round rotis?
The verdict isn’t so simple.
If we accept the rigmarole about the brain as true, then a roti of a strongly defined, deliberately derived shape will taste better. Or rather, we believe it tastes better, because we believe the cook is a well-seasoned cook and we expect his/her output will be well-seasoned too. Our brain, taking giant leaps of faith, tells us “this is good!” and we say out loud “These are lovely rotis, so fresh and round, what is your secret?” and the cook blushes prettily, humms and haws and refuses to divulge the real secret. Which, as we have just gathered, is all in your own head and has very little to do with the cook’s expertise.
Seeing the question as it is framed, therefore, it would appear that round rotis do not taste better than non-round rotis, since triangles and squares are non-round, but deliberately made that way and thus, are likely to taste on par with round rotis.
If we do not believe the theory that a deliberate shape equals culinary expertise equals tastier food then then round rotis, triangles and squares are likely to taste just as good as polygonal rotis.
Defining test: Blindfold, cut rotis into pieces so original shape cannot be identified. Ask eater to state which tastes better. Couldn’t be simpler if you really wanted to know.
How silly is this question, really?
No sillier than this blog post. They don’t get sillier than this, trust me, I’m a <ducks, weaves and leaves>